Literature Review
Instructions
- To provide feedback on the different criteria use the sliding bar to indicate where the student fits best. Note that the position of the scalebar does not reflect a linear scale from 0-10 points.
- The descriptions of performance levels are only indicative of what is expected and additional comments in the open remarks space 'Feedback/feedforward' may be necessary to fine-tune, add criteria, or specify feedback. The space 'Additional Criteria, Feedback, and Comments' at the bottom of the Rubric can also be used for this purpose.
- A written narrative accompanying the rubric should be filled in under 'Additional Criteria, Feedback, and Comments'. This field is obligatory.
- If a criterium is not applicable, you can use the eye icon on the right to grey-out the criterium.
- The rubrics are automatically saved to your browser, so you can continue working at a later time-point. To clear the rubrics for a next student use the option 'clear fields' at the bottom of the page. There you can also download the rubric use the 'Download rubric' button to turn it into a pdf document. The examiner must upload the pdf at the right step in OSIRIS Case.
- An instruction video on how you can make the best use of the rubrics can be found here.
|
|
Preconditions for literature review to be eligible for assessment
- This assignment has a single author (the student) *
- The assignment contains a plain language summary *
- A statement is made whether Generative AI has been used or not. If Generative AI has been used this is done with proper citation and according to the School's guidelines *
- The assignment is free of plagiarism and has been checked with Ouriginal (required for examiner)
- The rubrics are discussed between the examiner and daily supervisor, if not the same person (required for examiner)
- The rubrics are (orally) discussed with the student to provide extra feedback (required for examiner)
- Name supervisor/examiner
- Current date